Legal Opinion

DiMarco v. DiMarco

California Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1963No. S.F. 20978Published

1Opinion of the Court

60 Cal.2d 387 (1963)

385 P.2d 2

33 Cal. Rptr. 610

DOROTHY DiMARCO, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

FRANK DiMARCO, Defendant and Respondent.

Docket No. S.F. 20978.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

September 19, 1963.

Rebecca Wells Smith for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Garrett & Speier, Dan L. Garrett, Jr., and Henry C. Krivetsky for Defendant and Respondent.

McCOMB, J.

Plaintiff appeals from (1) an order of the trial court holding that a property settlement agreement in a divorce action, made by plaintiff and defendant, was nonintegrated; and (2) rulings denying plaintiff (a) the right to be furnished with…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Adams v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Dexter v. DexterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Lohman v. LohmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Bradley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Messenger v. MessengerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API