Legal Opinion

Powers v. Houghton

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1909No. Docket No. 30PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to Shiawassee; Miner, J. Case by Joseph Powers against James D. Houghton and John D. Haskins for malicious prosecution. A judgment for plaintiff is reviewed by defendants on writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.

On October 6, 1905, defendants herein sued out a writ of replevin against the plaintiff herein, before a justice of the peace for Shiawassee county, under which 16 lambs were, by the officer, taken and turned over to defendants. That action resulted in a verdict in favor of plaintiff herein, and the lambs in question were returned to him, the costs were paid by defendants herein, and no appeal was taken. In December, 1906, plaintiff brought suit against defendants, in an action of trespass on the case, for malicious prosecution. Upon the trial, plaintiff herein testified that he had sold the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brand v. HinchmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Antcliff v. JuneMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  3. McPherson v. RunyonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  4. Brounstein v. SahleinNew York Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Friedman v. DozorcMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  2. National Surety Co. v. PageCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932
  3. Young v. Motor City Apartments Limited Dividend Housing Ass'n No 1 & No 2Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Sage International, Ltd. v. Cadillac Gage Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1982
  5. Swain v. American Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API