Legal Opinion

Heine v. New York Life Ins. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 25, 1931No. 6405PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNeterer, District Judge

(after stating the facts).

The agency in Germany was established as a distinct entity, a German creation under German law. A reserve fund was made and all premiums received were placed in that fund and invested in Germany under German official approval. Upon creation of “Erónos,” all funds and property of appellee in Germany were delivered to and supervision and execution of power assumed by the German Federal Insurance Board, and additional deposits made by the appellee, as required by the German valorization laws, in accordance with the decisions of the German Federal Insurance Board. The…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Kline v. Burke Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Underhill v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Orient Insurance v. DaggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  4. Slater v. Mexican National RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  5. Douglas v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1929

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Merrell-Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. De Sairigne v. GouldDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1949
  3. Noto v. Cia Secula Di ArmanentoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970
  4. United States v. Pennzoil CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1965
  5. Williamson v. Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API