State v. Beal
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtConnor T. Hansen, J.
The defendant presents four issues on this appeal.(1) Whether the motion to suppress the evidence should have been granted because the complaint for the search warrant was based on hearsay?(2) Whether the issuance of the search warrant was predicated on future acts or contingencies ?(3) Whether the inspection of the parcel at the post office constituted an unreasonable search ?(4) Whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying probation to the defendant?
In October, 1967, the district attorney of Grant county was informed by a “federal employee charged with duties of law enforcement”…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- State v. FryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. DunnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. WardWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. DeSmidtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
- Taylor v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.