People v. Fraser
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco sustaining a demurrer to an information. Frank H. Dunne, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, J. H. Riordan, Deputy Attorney-General, C. M. Fickert, District Attorney, and Louis Ferrari, Assistant District Attorney, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.
The defendant in this case was charged in an information filed in the city and county of San Francisco, with having violated section 115 of the Penal Code, which reads as follows: “Every person who knowingly procures or offers any false or forged instrument to be filed, registered, or recorded in any public office within this state, which instrument, if genuine, might be filed, or registered, or recorded under any law of this state or of the United States, is guilty of a felony.”
The instrument referred to in the charging part of the information was set out in full, and purports to be a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hoag v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Miller v. DunnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Foorman v. WallaceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Colton Land & Water Co. v. SwartzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Warnock v. HarlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. PriceWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- People v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Lewis v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1927
- People v. OlfCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Rich v. ErvinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.