Legal Opinion

People v. Murphy

California Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 2011No. S180181PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J.

Defendant, Melissa Kay Murphy, submitted a false report to a deputy sheriff, stating that her vehicle had been stolen. We granted review to decide whether defendant’s felony conviction under a general statute governing the offering of a false instrument for filing in a public office (Pen. Code, § 115, subd. (a)) is precluded by special statutes in the Vehicle Code that make it a misdemeanor to make or file a false report of vehicle theft (Veh. Code, § 10501, subd. (a)) or to file a false statement with the Department of Motor Vehicles (Veh. Code, § 20). We conclude…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. People v. GilbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. In Re WilliamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. People v. JenkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. People v. RusterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. People v. LofchieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. People v. Mullins, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. People v. Henry, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. People v. Montalvo, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  5. Hudson v. Superior Court of Riverside CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API