Legal Opinion

Roy Klossner Company v. McIntire

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 20, 1957No. 13121PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Justice.

This case concerns the force of contractual clauses which expressly exclude all parol evidence, when it is alleged that the contract was induced by fraud. Roy Klossner Company, hereafter called lessor, sued F. B. Mclntire and F. B. Mclntire Construction Company, hereafter called lessee. Lessor sued upon a written lease contract to recover the cost of repairs to a crane it leased to lessee for use on a construction job. Lessee cross-acted for damages it claimed by reason of fraudulent oral representations about the condition of the machine. The jury found upon sufficient evidence…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Bates v. SouthgateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  2. Russell v. Industrial Transportation Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Edward Thompson Co. v. SawyersTexas Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Distributors Investment Co. v. PattonTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Rapid Transit Railway Co. v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1905

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Dallas Farm MacHinery Company v. ReavesTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Burleson State Bank v. Plunkett, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2000
  3. Neuhaus v. KainCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Woodmont, Inc. v. DanielsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
  5. Paxton v. SpencerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API