Legal Opinion

ATX Debt Fund 1, LLC v. Paul

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 21, 2023No. 1:19-cv-08540Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ATX DEBT FUND 1, LLC, Plaintiff, 19-CV-8540 (JPO) -v- OPINION AND ORDER NATIN PAUL, Defendant. J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge: This is an action on a loan guaranty filed by Plaintiff ATX Debt Fund 1, LLC (“ATX”) against the guarantor on the loan, Defendant Natin Paul, also known as Nate Paul. Paul has asserted counterclaims against ATX sounding in contract and the tort of fraud under New York law. ATX has moved to dismiss Paul’s counterclaims for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Marvel Characters, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Joseph H. Simon, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API