Legal Opinion

Brookside Mobile Home Park, Ltd. v. Peebles

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided November 9, 2000No. 990518-CAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JACKSON, Associate Presiding Judge:

{1 Brookside Mobile Home Park, Ltd. (Brookside) challenges the trial court's denial on reconsideration of Brookside's summary judgment motion, the directed verdict for Sam Peebles on Brookside's unlawful detain-er claim, and the denial of Brookside's request for attorney fees and costs. Sam Pee-bles cross appeals from the jury verdict and the trial court's denial of Peebles's request for attorney fees and costs. 1 We affirm on all issues, except that we reverse the trial court's denial of Peebles's request for attorney fees and costs.

BACKGROUND

{2 In…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Yee v. City of EscondidoSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. State v. CarterUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Billings v. Union Bankers Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Reid v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Dairy Product Services, Inc. v. City of WellsvilleUtah Supreme Court · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brookside Mobile Home Park, Ltd. v. PeeblesUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  2. 628 Park Avenue v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API