Legal Opinion
Rait v. Jacobs Bros.
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 16, 1966PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTheodore Velsor, J.
This is a motion to vacate service of a summons upon the ground that the court has no personal jurisdiction over the defendant. The application is based upon the dual premise that the defendant is a limited partnership organized and existing under the laws of the State of Now Jersey with principal offices in that State, and does not transact business in this State. Concededly the summons was served in New York upon a general partner of the defendant who resides in New York.
*904This court does not find it necessary to pass upon the sufficiency of the tangential reference contained in paragraph “ 8…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bulkley v. O'DonnellNew York Supreme Court · 1933
- Bulkley v. O'DonnellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
3Cited by4 opinions
- Itc Entertainment, Limited v. Nelson Film Partners and Frank MenkeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- First American Corp. v. Price Waterhouse LLPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Reading Metal Craft Co. v. Hopf Drive AssociatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
- Executive House Realty v. HagenNew York Supreme Court · 1981