Legal Opinion
Bulkley v. O'Donnell
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 17, 1933PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.
Defendant presents a novel question by a motion to change the place of trial from Albany county to Essex county. It is claimed that neither of the parties resides in Albany county *187and defendant’s motion is based upon his right to have the action tried in a proper county.
The action is brought to recover moneys due for stock purchased by plaintiffs for defendant’s account. The place of trial is, therefore governed by section 182 of the Civil Practice Act. Defendant is a resident of Essex county. Plaintiffs are a limited partnership having fifteen partners, one of whom, J. Graham Parsons,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rathbun v. BrownellNew York Supreme Court · 1904
- Shepard v. SquireNew York Supreme Court · 1894
- Lamson Consolidated Store-Service Co. v. SpeirNew York Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by9 opinions
- First American Corp. v. Price Waterhouse LLPCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Itc Entertainment, Limited v. Nelson Film Partners and Frank MenkeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- First American Corp. v. Price Waterhouse LLPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Bulkley v. O'DonnellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
- Rait v. Jacobs Bros.New York Supreme Court · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.