Legal Opinion

Kuert v. Kuert

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1956No. 5973PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIKER, Justice.

Two questions are framed by this appeal the first of which is one of first impression in this jurisdiction. 1.) Does the trial court have the power retroactively to abate accrued alimony payments from the date of the wife’s remarriage? 2.) If the first question be answered in the affirmative, did the trial court’s failure to abate the alimony payments accruing subsequent to the wife’s-remarriage constitute error in the instant situation ?

The facts pertinent to this appeal may be summarized as follows: The parties were divorced by the District Court of Chaves, County by its…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Sistare v. SistareSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Griffin v. GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Yarborough v. YarboroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Barber v. BarberSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Cohen v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Keller v. O'BrienMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  2. Nugent v. NugentNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Corliss v. CorlissNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Chavez v. ChavezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Dirks v. Dirks (In Re Dirks)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API