Legal Opinion

Weir v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 22, 1933PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWait, J.

The intestates were struck by an electric street car and were killed. They were standing about a foot to the north of the street railway track laid in a reservation at a point where a paved crossing, constructed by public authority as a duly established break for highway purposes, extended across the reservation. They were struck by the right hand corner of the car which overhung the rails on which the car rested. To any one standing where they were the approaching car had been in sight for more than a thousand feet. It was lighted. It was moving at from thirty to thirty-five miles per hour.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Austin v. Eastern Massachusetts Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  2. Renwick v. Eastern Massachusetts Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  3. Rundgren v. Boston & Northern Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  4. Loyle v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  5. McBride v. Middlesex & Boston Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. DeLodge v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  2. Berman v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API