Legal Opinion
Boyle v. Wegman
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 6, 1960PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.
The third-party defendant moves, pursuant to subdivision 4 of rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, for dismissal of the complaint-in-chief for legal insufficiency, and, as a consequence, for dismissal of the third-party complaint.
I agree with the movant that, under subdivision 2 of section 193-a of the Civil Practice Act, a third-party defendant may challenge the sufficiency of the complaint-in-chief and that the insufficiency of that complaint necessitates a resulting dismissal of the third-party complaint. (Twelfth Annual Report of N. Y. Judicial Council, 1946, pp. 208-212; Tripp, Guide…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Terner v. Glickstein & Terner, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Jacob Goodman & Co. v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1955
- Rhodes v. Little Falls Dairy Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- Rhodes v. Little Falls Dairy Company, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Jacob Goodman & Co. v. New York Telephone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mitler v. FriedebergNew York Supreme Court · 1961
- Local 144, Hotel, Hospital, Nursing Home & Allied Services Union, SEIU, AFL-CIO v. CNH Management Associates, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Jernberg v. Virtus Co.New York Supreme Court · 1961
- Rozay v. Hegeman Steel Products, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1962