Legal Opinion

Alabama Great Southern Railroad Co. v. Bishop

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 14, 1956No. 7 Div. 291PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*120SIMPSON, Justice.

The plaintiff recovered a judgment for personal injuries from which the defendant has appealed. Upon the former appeal of the case it was held that the defendant was entitled to the affirmative charge. Alabama Great So. R. Co. v. Bishop, 259 Ala. 629, 68 So.2d 530.

On the trial below which followed, one count was submitted to the jury charging the defendant with negligently constructing or maintaining a public railroad crossing in allowing a crevice to exist between the tracks and a cross-tie or timber parallel therewith and adjacent thereto. As a proximate consequence thereof…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Ex Parte GrimmettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad Co. v. SizemoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  3. Burton v. Horn & Hardart Baking Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  4. Alabama Great Southern R. Co. v. BaumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  5. Spooner v. D., L. & West. RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1889

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. White v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  2. Kilcrease v. HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  3. Garrett v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  4. Britton v. DoehringSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  5. Baptist Medical Center v. ByarsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API