Legal Opinion

Sanders v. Steen

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 15, 1900PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal from tlie. Circuit Court of Lamar. Tried before the Hon. S. H. Spiiott. This was an action of assumpsit brought by the appellee against the appellant. The facts of the case necessary to an understanding of the decision on the present appeal are sufficiently stated in the opinion. cited Hood v. Pioneer M. & M. Go., 95 Ala. 461; Evansville & P. P. Go. v. Slater, 101 Ala. 245; Wadsworth v. Williams, 101 Ala. 254.

1Opinion of the CourtTyson, J.

The original complaint filed in the circuit court contained the common counts. By amendment three counts were added. The first additional count sought to recover of the' defendant $49.04 for goods sold to him upon certain named dates and also $12.81 for goods sold him upon certain other specified dates.

The second one sought to recover $49.04 -for goods sold him by plaintiff for one Clanton.

The third was to recover $12.81 for goods sold him *634by plaintiff for one'Walker, with interest on each ol .said sums from November 1, 1892.

The only plea filed by defendant was that of the statute of frauds…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Torrey v. BurneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
  2. Montgomery & Eufaula Railway Co. v. KolbSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  3. Postal Telegraph Cable Co. v. HulseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
  4. Davis v. Badders & BrittSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  5. Burgin v. RapleeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Handley v. ShafferSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  2. Clardy v. WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901
  3. Callaway & Truitt v. GaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  4. Pool v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918
  5. Catts v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API