Legal Opinion

Steven Conant's Case

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided December 11, 1992No. 91-P-899PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFine, J.

The question before us is whether the Massachusetts Department of Industrial Accidents has jurisdiction over Steven Conant’s claim for benefits under the Massachusetts Workers’ Compensation Act, G. L. c. 152, for an injury he sustained in Vermont. The issue turns on whether Conant, a Massachusetts resident, entered into an employment contract in Massachusetts. If so, Massachusetts would have dual jurisdiction with Vermont over his workers’ compensation *696claim. See Pederzoli’s Case, 269 Mass. 550, 553 (1930); Lavoie’s Case, 334 Mass. 403, 407 (1956). Otherwise, notwithstanding Conant’s…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Alaska Packers Assn. v. Industrial Accident Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. LaClair v. Silberline Manufacturing Co., Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  3. Bowers v. American Bridge Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  4. Travelers Insurance v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Reynolds Electrical & Engineering Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Garrison v. Bechtel Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  2. Murphy's CaseMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
  3. Garrison v. Bechtel Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  4. Mendes's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API