Legal Opinion

United States v. Manafort

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided May 25, 2018No. Crim. Action No. 17–0201–01 (ABJ)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMY BERMAN JACKSON, United States District Judge *313Defendant Paul J. Manafort, Jr. has moved to dismiss either Count Four or Count Five of the Superseding Indictment [Dkt. # 202] on the grounds that the counts are multiplicitous. Def.'s Mot. to Dismiss One of Two Multiplicitous Counts [Dkt. # 236] ("Def.'s Mot."). He argues that since the two counts both charge the same offense, dual convictions would violate the Double Jeopardy Clause of the U.S. Constitution. Id. at 1. He also maintains that the unnecessary multiplication of counts will prejudice a jury against him. Id. The government opposed…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Iannelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Ball v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Garrett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. United States v. DaleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. BennettDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
  2. United States v. JoynerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
  3. United States v. McHughDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API