Legal Opinion

Ballew v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 16, 1970No. 5411PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Conley Byrd, Justice.

This is a motion for leave to file a petition pursuant to criminal procedure Rule No. 1, a post conviction remedy.

The petitioners’ convictions for assault with intent to kill were affirmed in this court in Ballew v. State, 246 Ark. 1191, 441 S. W. 2d 455 (1969). Thereafter through writ of habeas corpus they applied to U. S. District Court, the Honorable J. Smith Henley, Judge, alleging that the state courts denied them due process because a shot gun introduced into evidence and an out of court statement of Bobby Ballew should have been suppressed. An amended petition…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Rudolph J. Nassif v. United States of America, Paul Otto Schmadebeck v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
  3. Hall Neilson, in Error v. Wilson LagowSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
  4. Ballew v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  5. Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Clark v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  2. Coleman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  3. Cooper v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  4. Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  5. Petron v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API