Legal Opinion

Cooper v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 18, 1971No. 5549PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George Rose Smith, Justice.

This is a petition for postconviction relief under our Criminal Procedure Rule 1. Ark. Stat. Ann., Vol. 3A, 1969 Supp., p. 91. The trial court, without conducting an evidentiary hearing, found, in the language of the Rule, that the original record “conclusively” showed that the petitioner was entitled to no relief, for the reason that the asserted violation of the petitioner’s constitutional rights had been waived. For reversal the petitioner insists that the trial court should have granted a hearing upon the petition.

This petitioner and Willie Lee Paschal were…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Henry v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Kaufman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Ballew v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  5. Paschal v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  2. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  3. Coleman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  4. Perry v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  5. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API