Legal Opinion

Bailey v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 4, 1973No. CR 73-22PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lyle Brown, Justice.

This is an appeal from a Rule I hearing in which appellant was denied relief. Six points are listed for reversal, not one of which was listed in his petition. He never amended his petition. We are asked to treat the petition as amended to conform to the proof. We cannot agree to such procedure. We have many times held that the allegations for relief under Rule I must be stated in the petition or amendments thereto. The latest case is that of Fleschner v. State, 253 Ark. 58, 484 S.W. 2d 342 (1972), where we said:

The basis of this complaint [point on appeal] was not asserted…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Orman v. BishopSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  3. Credit v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  4. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  5. Ballew v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Keating v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  2. Murphy v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  3. Hansen v. OwensUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Hansen v. OwensUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Mitchell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API