Legal Opinion
Gibson & Perin Co., and Cross-Appellants v. City of Cincinnati, and Cross-Appellees
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 26, 1973No. 72-1607, 72-1608PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEICK, Circuit Judge.
The controversy in this case arose out of the Cincinnati Business District Core Project Urban Renewal Plan, hereinafter referred to as “Plan”, which Plan was adopted by ordinance passed by City Council in 1962 after two public hearings. The Plan was amended in 1964 and 1965. Under this Plan old, dilapidated business buildings in blighted areas of Cincinnati have been razed and *939replaced with fine, new, privately-owned buildings, with the help of private industry. We agree with the District Judge that urban renewal in Cincinnati has been an outstanding success and a real…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Moor v. County of AlamedaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Viviana Munoz-Mendoza v. Samuel R. Pierce, Jr.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- Control Data Corp. v. BaldrigeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- City of Rohnert Park v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- M. B. Guran Company, Inc. v. City of AkronCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- Schweig v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.