Legal Opinion

Miller v. Miller

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 2005No. Docket 127767PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Per curiam

This case presents the question whether the domestic relations arbitration act (DRAA)1 requires a formal hearing during arbitration comparable to that which occurs in traditional trial proceedings. We conclude that it does not.

*29Also at issue is whether a court order to which the parties have stipulated in writing can satisfy the act’s requirement of a written agreement to arbitrate. We conclude that it can. Therefore, we reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals, which ruled to the contrary on both issues, and we reinstate the arbitration award and the judgment of divorce.

THE FACTUAL AND…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nixon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. People v. KimbleMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Gordon Sel-Way, Inc. v. Spence Bros.Michigan Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange v. GavinMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  5. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Rohde v. Ann Arbor Public SchoolsMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Bukowski v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Cipriano v. CiprianoMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. City of Ferndale v. Florence Cement Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. People v. GadomskiMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API