Legal Opinion

Gordon v. Hillman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1919No. 15211PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from an order of the superior court for King county, Ronald, J., entered September 30, 1918, denying the vacation of an order appointing a receiver.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

E. M. Gordon et al. obtained a judgment against C. D. Hillman et al., and afterwards procured a writ of garnishment and had it served upon the Pacific Excursion Company, a corporation. The company, in responding to the writ, by way of a special appearance, moved to quash it. Upon the court’s denial of the motion, the company refused to plead further, and-judgment was entered against it. Thereafter, without notice to the company, Gordon et al. presented to the trial court a motion, supported by the affidavit of their attorney, for the appointment of a receiver for the company; and at once the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Ridgely v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shelton v. Second Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada Ex Rel. County of WashoeNevada Supreme Court · 1947
  2. F. S. Harmon & Co. v. Olympic Furniture Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Rummens v. HillmanWashington Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API