Legal Opinion
Page v. Bartels
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided May 7, 2001No. Civ.A. 01-1733PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Plaintiffs filed a Complaint seeking in-junctive relief to prevent defendants from implementing a plan for redistricting of New Jersey’s Senate and General Assembly districts. The plaintiffs having failed to satisfy their burden of proof, we will deny the injunction sought by the plaintiffs and enter final judgment for the defendants.
I
Article 4, Section III, ¶ 1 of the New Jersey State Constitution provides that:
After the next and every subsequent decennial census of the United States, the Senate districts and Assembly districts shall be established, and the senators and members of the…
3Cases cited18 opinions
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Thornburg v. GinglesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Johnson v. De GrandySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- City of Mobile v. BoldenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by14 opinions
- McNeil v. Legislative Apportionment CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
- Martinez v. BushDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2002
- In Re Constitutionality of Resolution 1987Supreme Court of Florida · 2002
- Robertson v. BartelsDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
- Robertson v. BartelsDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.