Legal Opinion

Robertson v. Bartels

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided June 18, 2001No. 01-2024PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

GREENBERG, Circuit Judge.

This matter comes on before this court on the plaintiffs’ complaint seeking injunc-tive relief to prevent the defendants from implementing a redistricting plan for New Jersey’s Senate and General Assembly districts. The plaintiffs allege that the redistricting plan violates the First, Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. Additionally, they challenge the constitutionality of New Jersey’s one-year district residency requirement as a requisite for an individual to be eligible to run for legislative office. The…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  5. Hunt v. CromartieSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. McNeil v. Legislative Apportionment CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
  2. Rodriguez v. PatakiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
  3. Robertson v. BartelsDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
  4. Covington v. North CarolinaDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2018
  5. Georgia State Conference of the NAACP v. Fayette County Board of CommissionersDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API