Legal Opinion

Curt Bean Transport, Inc. v. Hill

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided November 11, 2009No. CA 09-419PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KAREN R. BAKER, Judge.

It The primary issue in this workers’ compensation case is whether the statutory presumption of intoxication found in Ark. Code Ann. § 11-9-102(4)(B)(iv)(b) (Supp. 2009) is raised by a claimant’s refusal to take the particular test requested by the employer. The parties do not dispute that appellant, Curt Bean Transport, Inc., requested that appellee, Lawrence Hill, take a hair-follicle test four days after he wrecked a large truck and that he refused. Curt Bean appeals the ruling of the Workers’ Compensation Commission that Hill’s injuries from the wreck were…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Clark v. Peabody Testing ServiceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  2. ERC Contractor Yard & Sales v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Freeman v. Con-Agra Frozen FoodsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  4. MacSteel Division of Quanex v. Arkansas Oklahoma Gas Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  5. Stone v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nucor Steel-Arkansas v. Arkansas Pollution Control & Ecology CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API