Legal Opinion
Communication Workers v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 29, 1991No. Nos. 90-1936, 90-1950PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
GREENBERG, Circuit Judge.
American Telephone and Telegraph Company appeals, invoking jurisdiction under the collateral order doctrine, from orders of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania of July 27, 1990, and November 7, 1990, in this action involving claims brought against it by the Communication Workers of America (CWA) involving two of the Union’s units. The complaint alleged that AT & T had contracted work out to nonbargaining unit employees in violation of its agreement not to do so. AT & T moved for a summary judgment, claiming…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist. of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Communication Workers of America, Afl-Cio, District 13, Communication Workers of America, Afl-Cio, and District 3, Communication Workers of America, Afl-Cio v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Honorable Louis C. Bechtle, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Nominal Communication Workers of America, Afl-Cio, District 13, Communication Workers of America, Afl-Cio, and District 3, Communication Workers of America, Afl-Cio v. American Telephone and Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Murphy v. Housing Authority & Urban Redevelopment AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Doyle Ray Evans v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995