Legal Opinion
Qualcomm Inc. v. Compal Elecs., Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided September 7, 2017No. Case No. 3:17–cv–01010–GPC–MDDPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hon. Gonzalo P. Curiel, United States District Judge
Before the Court is a motion for preliminary injunction filed by Plaintiff Qualcomm Incorporated ("Qualcomm") against Defendants Compal Electronics, Inc. ("Compal"), FIH Mobile Ltd. and Hon Hai Precision Industry Co. (together "Foxconn"), Pegatron Corporation ("Pegatron"), and Wistron Corporation ("Wistron"), collectively "Defendants" or "Contract Manufacturers." Dkt. No. 35-1. The motion has been fully briefed. Defendants filed an opposition on July 18, 2017, as did Third-Party Defendant, Apple Inc. ("Apple"). Dkt. Nos. 72, 80. Qualcomm…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ebay Inc. v. Mercexchange, L. L. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Armstrong v. County of PlacerDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Cocina Cultura LLC v. State of OregonDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2020
- GP Asset Holdings, LLC v. RossLaw, PLLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2024
- Nima Ghadimi v. Arizona Bank & Trust, et al.District Court, D. Arizona · 2025