Legal Opinion

Blankenship v. City of Williamson

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1926No. 5363PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Woods, Judge:

In an action against the City of Williamson for injuries sustained by reason of its negligence in leaving a certain street out of repair, the plaintiff recovered a $1,000.00 judgment. From this judgment the city prosecutes this writ of error.

The paved portion of East Fourth Avenue was sixteen feet wide. At the point of the accident there was no sidewalk on either side of the street, and because of the steep eighteen-foot embankment down to the railroad tracks on the south and the hillside on the north, pedestrians were required to use the street, which was also used by vehicles.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ehrgott v. . Mayor, Etc., of City of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. Ring v. . City of CohoesNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  3. Bassett v. City of St. JosephSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  4. Gonzales v. City of GalvestonTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Sheff v. City of HuntingtonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1880

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Evans v. FarmerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Taylor v. City of HuntingtonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Frye v. McCrory Stores CorporationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Patton v. City of GraftonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Wehner v. WeinsteinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API