State v. Triggs
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VIGIL, Judge.
{1} Defendant violated parole and, pursuant to the terms of a plea agreement, the State filed a supplemental criminal information seeking to enhance Defendant’s sentence for seven of the offenses that were not previously enhanced under the plea agreement. The State used two prior felony convictions to seek enhancement of the basic sentence imposed for those seven offenses. The district court found Defendant to be an habitual offender, enhanced Defendant’s sentence for each of the seven offenses by four years, and ordered the sentences to be served consecutively, resulting…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. AllenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. AnayaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. DuranNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. YazzieNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. YazzieNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. ArreolaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. BrownNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.