State v. Garcia
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WECHSLER, Judge.
{1} Defendant Joe Garcia appeals his conviction of contributing to the delinquency of a minor (CDM), a fourth degree felony, contrary to NMSA 1978, Section 30-6-3 (1990). We hold that (1) the State presented sufficient evidence to support Defendant’s conviction; (2) the CDM statute did not violate Defendant’s right to free expression under the federal and state constitutions; (3) the CDM statute is not unconstitutionally overbroad under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution; (4) as a matter of due process, the CDM statute is not unconstitutionally vague;…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Gooding v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. GarnenezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. Rael-GallegosNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. Quintin C.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. VillanuevaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2021
- State v. Rael-GallegosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.