State v. Yazzie

{1} On appeal, Defendant challenges the district court's imposition of a habitual offender enhancement to his sentence following a violation of his probation. Defendant raises two issues on appeal. First, Defendant argues that he was not subject to enhancement at the time of the probation violation because he had completed his sentence as to that particular conviction under his plea agreement. Second, Defendant argues that the district court erred in not applying the 2002 amendment to the habitual offender statute, *222 NMSA 1978, § 31-18-17 (1993, amended 2002 and 2003), limiting the time period…