Legal Opinion

Wolf Camera, Inc. v. Royter

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 14, 2002No. A01A2072, A01A2075; A01A2073, A01A2076; A01A2074, A01A2077PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blackburn, Chief Judge.

In this action regarding the malicious prosecution of a store employee for theft, Wolf Camera, Inc., Leonard Wayne, and Rex Smith (defendants) appeal the jury’s verdict of $580,0001 in favor of Arthur Royter, contending that the trial court erred by: (1) denying their motions for a directed verdict and judgment notwithstanding *255the verdict; (2) charging the jury on punitive damages; and (3) allowing testimony regarding an incident involving Royter and Wayne’s wife. In related cross-appeals, Royter contends that the trial court erred by denying his request for prejudgment…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Baker v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  2. Hawkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  3. Willis v. BrassellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  4. Department of Transportation v. Dalton Paving & Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  5. Roberts v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Adams v. CarlisleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  2. Ford Motor Co. v. ReeseCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  3. Turnage v. KasperCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  4. Vojnovic v. BrantsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  5. Smith v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LPCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API