Legal Opinion

Griffith v. Sands

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 8, 1928No. 12,179PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Denison

A demurrer to the complaint was sustained and judgment thereupon went for defendant. Plaintiff brings error. Both parties ask for a final decision on motion for supersedeas.

The complaint alleges that one James, plaintiff’s father, signed, sealed and acknowledged a deed which purported to convey certain land to plaintiff, hut died without actually delivering it to her. She concedes that a deed must he delivered to he valid, hut contends that the one in question was constructively delivered because of the following facts alleged in the complaint: “That

shortly before his death, he, the said John…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fisher v. OliverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Riegel v. RiegelIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
  3. International State Bank v. Trinidad Bean & Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1926
  4. Brown v. BrownSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1876
  5. Baker v. CordwellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1882

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Page v. ClarkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  2. Sky Harbor, Inc. v. JennerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
  3. Barnes v. SpanglerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1933
  4. Carnahan v. GuptonMontana Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Miller v. TalbottMontana Supreme Court · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API