Legal Opinion

International State Bank v. Trinidad Bean & Elevator Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 5, 1926No. 11,382PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison

The bank was plaintiff below; a demurrer to its complaint was sustained; judgment for defendant and plaintiff brings error.

The demurrer was on two grounds, 1. Insufficient facts. 2. Ambiguity. There were no specifications on the second ground, so it was a nullity; the only question before us, then, is whether the facts were sufficient.

Omitting details and evidential matters, the substance of the complaint is that defendant, a warehouseman, held, as such, goods of which plaintiff was sole owner, and of the receipt for which plaintiff was assignee of the original bailor, the Rocky Mountain Bean…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McGaw v. Acker, Merrall & Condit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
  2. Philpot v. TaylorIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Levitzky v. CanningCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Baker v. CordwellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1882
  5. Hanna v. BarkerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1882

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Bernhard v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. Turner v. Zip Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1954
  3. McNeill v. AllenColorado Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Brochner v. Western Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  5. Elijah v. FenderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API