Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Briarwood Development Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 20, 1983No. 47100, 47101PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRANDALL, Judge.

Before us are two cases, consolidated for appeal, involving separate judgments arising out of identical facts. Plaintiffs, trustees of various retirement trusts, loaned funds to defendant Briarwood in return for several promissory notes, all personally guaranteed by co-defendant Alberta Dick-man. Both cases were submitted based on a record consisting solely of a stipulation of facts and the pleadings. The trial court found both defendants liable for the full amount of principal, interest and attorney’s fees, totaling $664,662.93 in the action brought by J.H. Reynolds, et al.,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bennett v. WoodSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  2. Commercial Nat. Bank of Kansas City, Kan. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  3. Brock Ex Rel. Lakas v. StewardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Dixon v. Bi-State Development AgencyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Haas Baking Co. v. LuzioMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Southern Missouri Bank v. FogleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Wright v. MartinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. First Community Credit Union v. LevisonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Clayton Brokerage Co. of St. Louis, Inc. v. RaleighMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Thompson v. St. JohnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API