Legal Opinion

Clayton Brokerage Co. of St. Louis, Inc. v. Raleigh

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 4, 1984No. 47943PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GAERTNER, Presiding Judge.

Defendant appeals from the entry of summary judgment in favor of plaintiff on its claim based upon breach of contract. Defendant was employed by plaintiff as a commodities broker from April 20, 1978, until October 29, 1982. Paragraph seven of his written contract of employment provided that he was “to be responsible, and to promptly reimburse Clayton for the payment of deficits in customer’s accounts handled by Employee.” Defendant also signed a memorandum acknowledging his understanding that he would be held responsible for all deficit accounts of his customers as…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. J. E. Hathman, Inc. v. Sigma Alpha Epsilon Club of ColumbiaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
  2. Grantham v. Rockhurst UniversityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Snowden v. Northwest Missouri State UniversityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. J. G. Jackson Associates v. MosleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958
  5. Sturgeon v. State Bank of FiskMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Steinberg v. FleischerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Union Center Redevelopment Corp. v. LeslieMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Moore v. SeabaughMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Armoneit v. EzellMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Mosley v. Members of the Civil Service Board for the BerkeleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API