Legal Opinion
United States v. Kincaid-Chauncey
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 20, 2009No. 06-10544PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge BYBEE; Concurrence by Judge BERZON.
BYBEE, Circuit Judge:
Mary Kincaid-Chauncey appeals her convictions for honest services wire fraud, aiding and abetting honest services wire fraud, conspiracy to commit honest services wire fraud, and Hobbs Act extortion under color of official right. Kincaid-Chauncey raises three claims of error: She claims that the district court precluded her from calling witnesses to support her defense and that the district court gave erroneous instructions on both the honest services fraud and the extortion counts. For the reasons that follow, we affirm…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Crane v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. SchefferSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- United States v. WhitfieldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Adilao Ortiz v. James YatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. WilkesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Wayne BryantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Mattel, Inc. v. MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.