Legal Opinion

Adilao Ortiz v. James Yates

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 6, 2012No. 11-56383PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge BERZON;

Dissent by Judge FERNANDEZ.

OPINION

BERZON, Circuit Judge:

Petitioner Adilao Juan Ortiz (“Ortiz”) was convicted by a jury of willful infliction of corporal injury to his spouse in violation of California Penal Code § 273.5. At trial, Ortiz’s wife, Miriam Ortiz (“Miriam”) testified on behalf of the prosecution. Ortiz maintains that he was denied his Sixth Amendment right to confront adverse witnesses when the trial judge precluded his trial counsel from asking Miriam whether she was afraid to deviate from her initial incriminating statement to the police because of threats…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Floyd Mayes v. Jeff PremoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. Raymond Gibbs v. Patrick CovelloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  3. Michael Cuero v. Matthew CateCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  4. Marks v. DavisDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
  5. Floyd Mayes v. Jeff PremoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API