Legal Opinion

Tosto v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1946No. 29849PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMallery, J.

This action was instituted by Catherine Tosto, administratrix of the estate of Frank Tosto, deceased, to recover damages for the wrongful death of Frank Tosto and for the benefit of Catherine Tosto, the surviving spouse of Frank Tosto. The city of Seattle and William Herth, the driver of the bus owned by the city of Seattle and operated by it as a part of its transit system, are named defendants.

Plaintiff’s intestate was a passenger in an automobile operated by one William Van Dusen, going south, which collided with a city bus going north on Twentieth avenue west at Bertona street. Twentieth…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Burlie v. StephensWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Hartley v. LasaterWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Chadwick v. EkWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Portland-Seattle Auto Freight, Inc. v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Zettler v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1929

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Radecki v. AdamsWashington Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API