Legal Opinion

United States v. Praetorius

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided January 4, 1980No. 78 CR 135PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

NICKERSON, District Judge.

On September 20, 1978, defendants Charles and Diann Praetorius moved pursuant to Rule 41(e) of the Rules of Criminal Procedure for return of property, among other items ninety-two thousand dollars in United States currency, seized by the government on March 16 and March 29, 1978. At the parties’ request the hearing on the motion was thereafter adjourned and is now pressed by defendants’ attorneys Diller, Schmukler & Asness (“Diller”), to whom defendants assigned their interest in the currency.

The background is as follows. In an indictment filed on…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Trupiano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. United States v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. United States v. Luther R. Wilson, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  5. United States v. Ralph MarianiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Marger v. BellDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1980
  2. Schwartz v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API