Legal Opinion

Hamza v. Midas, Inc

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided September 11, 2023No. 1:23-cv-00543Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK H.E. AMIR M. HAMZA, Plaintiff, V. 1:23-CV-0543 (MAD/CFH) MIDAS, INC., et al. Defendants. APPEARANCES: H.E. Amir M. Hamza PO Box 281 Philmont, New York 12565 Plaintiff pro se I CHRISTIAN F. HUMMEL U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE REPORT-RECOMMENDATION & ORDER I. In Forma Pauperis Plaintiff purported to commence this action on May 4, 2023, with the filing of a complaint and application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). See Dkt. No. 1 (“Compl.”), 2 (IFP). After reviewing plaintiff's IFP application, the undersigned determines that…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Ben Gary Triestman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  3. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Natalia Makarova v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  5. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API