Legal Opinion
State v. Riddock Byrnes
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided September 28, 1907No. 6672PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Proceeding by Attorney General J. Fraser Lyon on behalf of the State by petition and rule issued by Mr. Justice Gary, returnable to the Court, against Riddock Byrnes, E.W. Blitch and the Charleston Consolidated Railway Gas and Electric Company, to enjoin the maintenance of a nuisance.
PETITION.
The first paragraph of the petition alleges the copartnership of Riddock Byrnes and the employment by them of E.W. Blitch.
The second alleges the incorporation of the Charleston Consolidated Railway Gas and Electric Company, that it owned and operated street car lines and a lighting plant and that it…
2Cited by6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Lyon v. Columbia Water Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1909
- State v. WeilSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1909
- Ex Parte JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
- In re Hearing before Joint Legislative Committee of House & Senate created by Joint Resolution No. 622Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
- State ex rel. Daniel v. AndersonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.