Cadle Co. II v. Schellman
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
Defendant Mark Schellman 1 appeals and plaintiff cross-appeals from a judgment subjecting a houseboat and other equipment to execution on a prior judgment. We reverse in part on the appeal and affirm on the cross-appeal.
This case involves the application of the Fraudulent Transfers and Conveyances Act (Act). ORS 95.200 et seq. We review de novo, Allen v. Meinig, 109 Or App 341, 819 P2d 744 (1991), rev den 313 Or 209 (1992), and make the following findings. Defendant’s father, Armond, was president of and a major shareholder in Tantra, a corporation formed to engage in bridge demolition. In…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Linn County v. RozelleOregon Supreme Court · 1945
- Scholes v. Sipco Services & Marine, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- Blackford v. BoakOregon Supreme Court · 1914
- Allen v. MeinigCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Olsen v. Deschutes CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Twigg v. OpsahlCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
- Turudic v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Olsen v. Deschutes CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Petix v. GillinghamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024