Legal Opinion

Montano v. Kimmel

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1945PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSwezey, J.

This is a motion by defendant to strike the action from the equity calendar on the ground that plaintiffs’ alleged cause of action is one at law.

This action was brought for specific performance to compel defendant to fulfill his contract with the plaintiffs by having this court decree his forthwith removal from the apartment. The gravamen of the action is specific performance and arises from the contract of purchase and sale. The defendant contends that because of the provision in the contract for a six months’ lease, he became the plaintiffs’ tenant and so comes within the protection of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McPherson v. . SchadeNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Baumann v. . PinckneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Jones v. BarnesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Moss v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. Graf v. RootSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  3. Scheir v. LeiferAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API