Legal Opinion
United States v. Northrup
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided January 10, 1980No. CR-LV-79-41, HECPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
CLAIBORNE, District Judge.
The within action is before the Court on the Motion for Judgment of Acquittal pursuant to F.R.Cr.P. Rule 29(c) or, in the Alternative, Motion for New Trial pursuant to F.R.Cr.P. Rule 33, filed on behalf of Defendant James Davis “J. D.” Northrup.
I
The motion to acquit is before the Court by reason of this procedural posture: On April 17, 1979, the Federal Grand Jury indicted Defendants Northrup, Wilch, Harry Blasey, and Richard Blasey on violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1962(c) and (d), and indicted Defendant Schmoutey on violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1962(c), 1962(d),…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. ElliottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. Franke HohebCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- United States v. William J. O'connell, United States of America v. Richard CrossmanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- State v. AtenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
- State v. SaizNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2017
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. Franke HohebCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.