Legal Opinion
United States v. William J. O'connell, United States of America v. Richard Crossman
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided April 1, 1983No. 81-1222, 81-1223 and 81-1648PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BREYER, Circuit Judge.
After a jury trial, appellants William O’Connell and Richard Crossman were convicted of conspiring to receive and possess, and of receiving and possessing, goods (namely, jewelry) stolen from an interstate air carrier shipment. 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 659. Crossman was also convicted of perjury before the grand jury investigating the theft. 18 U.S.C. § 1623. And, after a separate trial, Crossman was convicted of forcibly assaulting the officer who served him with a grand jury subpoena. 18 U.S.C. § 111. O’Connell and Crossman appeal, primarily on the ground of insufficient…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Ladner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- United States v. Gordon PennellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Daryl E. SingleterryCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Sam Qaoud Evan H. Callanan, Sr. Evan H. Callanan, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Alfred Scivola, Jr.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Albert Reginald WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.