Legal Opinion

Forest Products Co. v. Magistrelli

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided March 18, 1940PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Layton, C. J.,

delivering the opinion of the Court:

This cause is before the Court on a motion of Astell and Beeman, Inc., appearing specially, to quash garnishee process issued against it.

From the stipulation of facts, which may be accepted as a special answer on the part of the garnishee, it appears that as of August 24, 1939, Astell and Beeman, Inc., a New York corporation, was engaged in this State in the performance of a contract with the United States. Joseph Magistrelli, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, trading as Wharton Construction Co., was engaged in the same work as a sub-contractor…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Harris v. BalkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. SturmSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. DeerSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  4. Illinois Life Insurance v. PrentissIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Wyeth Hardware & Manufacturing Co. v. H. F. Lang & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1895

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Candlewood Timber Group, LLC v. Pan American Energy, LLCSupreme Court of Delaware · 2004
  2. Weinress v. BlandCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1950
  3. Weinress v. BlandCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1950
  4. D'ANGELO v. Petroleos MexicanosDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1974
  5. Local Union 1034 AFL-CIO v. GloverSupreme Court of Delaware · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API