Forest Products Co. v. Magistrelli
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Layton, C. J.,
delivering the opinion of the Court:
This cause is before the Court on a motion of Astell and Beeman, Inc., appearing specially, to quash garnishee process issued against it.
From the stipulation of facts, which may be accepted as a special answer on the part of the garnishee, it appears that as of August 24, 1939, Astell and Beeman, Inc., a New York corporation, was engaged in this State in the performance of a contract with the United States. Joseph Magistrelli, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, trading as Wharton Construction Co., was engaged in the same work as a sub-contractor…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Harris v. BalkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. SturmSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. DeerSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Illinois Life Insurance v. PrentissIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
- Wyeth Hardware & Manufacturing Co. v. H. F. Lang & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1895
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Candlewood Timber Group, LLC v. Pan American Energy, LLCSupreme Court of Delaware · 2004
- Weinress v. BlandCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1950
- Weinress v. BlandCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1950
- D'ANGELO v. Petroleos MexicanosDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1974
- Local Union 1034 AFL-CIO v. GloverSupreme Court of Delaware · 1983