Legal Opinion

Morris v. Eisner

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided July 31, 1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Complainant seeks a decree for the specific performance of a contract by which defendant agreed to purchase the premises known as No. 161 New Brunswick avenue, in Perth Amboy.

The case has been submitted on the pleadings and a stipulation of facts, and from these it appears that the contract was originally made on January 4th, 1924, with one Harry Breslow, who assigned the contract to defendant with complainant's consent, on April 2d. By the terms of a supplemental contract, made on April 2d, between complainants and defendant, an additional payment of $1,000 was made by defendant, on account…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Herring v. EspositoNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1922
  2. Scheinman v. BlochSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1922
  3. Plummer v. Keppler & ScanlanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1875
  4. Ratkewicz v. KaraSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1918
  5. Hummer v. BuerkNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1919

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Centex Homes Corp. v. BoagNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  2. Starego v. SoboloskiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API